Is PFRDA getting into in a turf war with IRDA?

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) now want to regulate of all existing pension schemes from insurance companies after the PFRDA Bill, introduced in Lok Sabha is passed.

PFRDA claims that monitoring all retirement and pension savings products is their mandate. Moreover, the Direct Taxes Code (DTC) too, gives PFRDA the power to approve savings intermediaries eligible for tax sops and prescribe an investment pattern for pension funds.

Life insurers at present own pension schemes in their product portfolio, as they are permitted under Insurance Act, 1938. Moreover, they (pension schemes) contribute a major portion of the insurers' revenue, which also infuses reluctance for the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) to part with its regulatory powers on pension schemes to PFRDA.

We believe that both PFRDA and IRDA should act in a very responsibly and mature way. Instead of indulging in a regulatory turf war against each other, regulators should mutually settle the matter and come up with solutions which are in the policyholders' interest.

Proving one's mettle over the other and winning more regulatory powers is unhealthy for the industry as a whole. One should overview things at which one is best. So, instead of getting into a tussle, the respective regulators should behave in a mature way which is also in the larger interest of the industry and policyholders.